The study identified “list fatigue”—users starting many lists but abandoning them. This reflected a tension between the desire for order and the overwhelming volume of content. By late 2018, some platforms introduced “auto-tagging” and “smart lists” to reduce manual effort.

While users believed they were creating personal lists, platforms like Pocket and Twitter increasingly used bookmark data to fuel recommendation engines. A “new bookmarking list” in 2018 was never fully private; it trained algorithms that would later suggest content to the user and others.

By 2018, Delicious had been sold multiple times and was largely abandoned. Digg’s revival failed to capture the original bookmarking crowd. Reddit’s upvote system had replaced some bookmarking functions but lacked personal categorization.

In 2018, public bookmarking lists functioned as a form of intellectual self-presentation. A well-organized list on Are.na or a curated Pocket feed signaled taste, expertise, and digital literacy—similar to a public library or mixtape.

Revisiting the Link: A Study of New Bookmarking Lists in 2018 and Their Role in Digital Curation

The year 2018 represented a transitional period for social bookmarking platforms. While legacy tools like Delicious had faded, a new generation of bookmarking services—such as Are.na, refined Pocket features, and early Notion integrations—reshaped how users organized online content. This paper examines the characteristics, user behaviors, and limitations of “new bookmarking lists” created in 2018. Through a qualitative analysis of platform documentation and user-generated metadata, we argue that 2018 marked a shift from individual archiving to collaborative, visually-oriented, and semi-algorithmic curation.

[Generated for Academic Purposes] Date: April 14, 2026

>