Scorned 1994 Wikipedia [repack] Today

Instead, the page lists the runtime, the aspect ratio, and then dips out. Why? Because the movie was universally panned and mostly unseen. It went straight to VHS. The Wikipedia page treats this absence of praise as a dignified silence. It’s like the page is saying, "We have verified that this film exists. We will not be taking further questions." If you only read the plot, you’re missing the fun. The Scorned Wikipedia page has a "Notes" section that does the heavy lifting.

Scorned does not have that.

But I wasn’t reminded of this film because of a nostalgic re-watch. I fell down the rabbit hole last night reading its , and let me tell you—the article is arguably more entertaining than the movie itself. It reads less like a standard encyclopedia entry and more like a police report written by a very tired, very sarcastic film student. scorned 1994 wikipedia

God bless the internet. Have you fallen down a weird Wikipedia rabbit hole for a terrible 90s movie? Tell me which one in the comments. (I’m betting on Temptress from 1995.) Instead, the page lists the runtime, the aspect